On 8 April we published a factsheet looking at some of the main types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation seen so far. We analysed a sample of 225 pieces of misinformation rated false or misleading by fact-checkers and published in English between January and the end of March 2020, drawn from a collection of fact-checks maintained by First Draft.
The lead author of that piece of research is J. Scott Brennen, Research Fellow at the Reuters Institute.
Watch the webinar here:
Top editorial positions in major news outlets matter both substantially and symbolically. Top editors make important decisions every day. They also represent their outlets, and collectively help represent the news media more broadly. The diversity (or lack thereof) of top editors is thus symbolically important and likely to shape how news media are perceived by different parts of the public.
The Reuters Institute recently published a factsheet analysing the gender break-down of top editors in a strategic sample of 200 major online and offline news outlets in ten different markets across four continents. One of the authors of that factsheet was Meera Selva, Director of our Journalist Fellowship Programme.
Watch webinar here:
With the BBC and other public service media facing increased political scrutiny and many increasing their audience during the COVID–19 pandemic, this is a good time to take stock about what research can tell us about the role of public service news in different countries.
In September 2019 we published a report looking at eight European countries. The report suggested that public service media tend to have wider reach with their news in cases where they are relatively well-funded, integrated, and centrally organized, and have a degree of strategic autonomy and insulation from direct political influence. However, even such organizations still struggle to reach younger people and people with more limited formal education. This creates the risk that public service is funded by everybody but primarily delivered to already often well-served older and more highly educated people. Most of these news brands are widely used and highly trusted, but they are often less trusted by people on the political right and people with populist attitudes.
The lead author of that report was Anne Schulz, a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Reuters Institute and one of the members of the team that produces the Digital News Report.
Watch webinar here:
Uncertainty and controversy around the COVID–19 pandemic has intensified the debate about misinformation in the last few weeks. “We're not just fighting an epidemic; we're fighting an infodemic”, said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. We don’t have new data on how the outbreak is changing news consumption around the world. However, researchers at the Reuters Institute have been investigating how media outlets and technologies shape, mediate, and reflect the global problems of misinformation.
A post we recently published provides a short overview of this research with seven highlights that can help us understand how people navigate information (and misinformation) and what role journalism and news can play in the current pandemic. One of the authors of that post is Rasmus Nielsen, Director of the Reuters Institute and Professor of Political Communication at the University of Oxford. He will explain our key findings on a webinar on Thursday 26 March 2020 at 13:30, GMT.
Watch webinar